Home » Methodology

Methodology

CoinMarketExpert does not publish “best of” lists based on marketing budgets or commercial agreements.

Our rankings are produced using a repeatable, criteria-driven methodology designed to assess platforms from the perspective of risk, fairness, and real-world user outcomes.


Core Evaluation Categories

Crypto casinos and platforms are evaluated across multiple dimensions, including but not limited to:

Trust & Risk Signals

  • Licensing transparency
  • Corporate structure clarity
  • Jurisdictional exposure
  • Historical user complaints and disputes

Payments & Custody

  • Supported cryptocurrencies
  • Deposit and withdrawal reliability
  • Processing speed consistency
  • Custodial vs non-custodial models

Platform Integrity

  • Game provider quality
  • Provably fair mechanisms (where applicable)
  • Technical stability
  • Withdrawal friction patterns

User Experience

  • Interface usability
  • Bonus clarity and wagering transparency
  • Customer support responsiveness

Data Sources

Our analysis incorporates:

  • Publicly available platform data
  • On-chain observations where relevant
  • User-reported issues aggregated over time
  • Proprietary monitoring tools and internal datasets

No single data point determines ranking outcomes.


Scoring & Weighting

Scores are derived from weighted models rather than subjective opinion.

Weightings may evolve as market conditions change, but changes are applied consistently across all evaluated platforms to preserve fairness and comparability.


Commercial Neutrality

Affiliate relationships do not:

  • Affect scoring
  • Alter rankings
  • Override negative findings

A platform with strong commercial terms but weak operational integrity will rank poorly.


Limitations

No methodology can eliminate risk entirely.

CoinMarketExpert does not provide financial, legal, or gambling advice. Users are responsible for understanding local laws and personal risk tolerance.

Scroll to Top